<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description>an aggregation of resources dealing with scholarly communication, open access, digital libraries, institutional repositories, metadata, and other issues of academic librarianship. —Josh Honn.</description><title>http://joshhonn.com</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @joshhonn)</generator><link>http://joshhonn.com/</link><item><title>Compact for Open-Access Publishing Equity</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.oacompact.org/"&gt;Compact for Open-Access Publishing Equity&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We the undersigned universities recognize the crucial value of the services provided by scholarly publishers,  the desirability of open access to the scholarly literature, and the  need for a stable source of funding for publishers who choose to provide  open access to their journals’ contents. Those universities and funding  agencies receiving the beneﬁts of publisher services should recognize  their collective and individual responsibility for that funding, and  this recognition should be ongoing and public so that publishers can  rely on it as a condition for their continuing operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/873143965</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/873143965</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:49:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Institutional Open Access Funds: Now Is the Time</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1000375"&gt;Institutional Open Access Funds: Now Is the Time&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We believe that institutions (and the sub-institutional units that  manage collection funds) should be open to exploring alternative funding  models for scholarly communication. Institutions should highly value  funding models that promote universal access to their research output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/873049414</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/873049414</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:22:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Open Access in Canada: A Strong Beginning</title><description>&lt;a href="http://eprints.rclis.org/16870/"&gt;Open Access in Canada: A Strong Beginning&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scholarly open access (OA), one of CLA’s information policy advocacy areas, has reached critical momentum in Canada. New initiatives are being announced regularly in all areas of the open access movement, including OA publishing, repositories and mandates. Established projects are becoming regularized and growing. Most of these initiatives are library-based or are connected to libraries in some way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/873004205</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/873004205</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:09:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No Deposit, No Diploma</title><description>&lt;a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/07/22/no-deposit-no-diploma/"&gt;No Deposit, No Diploma&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I concluded that after spending a year on writing a public document,  only to make it as inaccessible as possible, was antithetical to the  purpose it was intended to fulfill. Indeed, consigning to lock up a  dissertation on open access seemed inconsistent, if not downright  hypocritical. And lastly, I have yet to find a publisher who has a hard  policy against accepting a manuscript that was derived from a graduate  thesis. While most serious journals have statements about only  accepting original material, filing a dissertation does not seem to  constitute “prior publication,” or at least none are willing to state  this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/871450879</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/871450879</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:33:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Numbers vs. Meaning</title><description>&lt;a href="http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2010/07/21/numbers-vs-meaning/"&gt;Numbers vs. Meaning&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Librarians keep a lot of statistics and measure a lot of things. Gate  count, reference transactions, instruction sessions, website hits,  visits to a specific tutorial or research guide, e-resource usage, etc.  We are &lt;em&gt;big &lt;/em&gt;on numbers. I have no problem whatsoever with  measuring things like this and in many cases I think it’s essential. The  thing I do have a problem with are the unsupported interpretations we  often make based on these numbers and the direction they’re going in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/871410340</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/871410340</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:20:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Mandate of Open Access IR Managers</title><description>&lt;a href="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/752-The-Mandate-of-Open-Access-Institutional-Repository-Managers.html"&gt;The Mandate of Open Access IR Managers&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open Access (OA) Institutional Repository (IR) managers need to remind themselves that their mandate  is to see to it that their IRs are filled with OA’s target content  (peer-reviewed research journal articles) so as to maximize the  accessibility, visibility, usage and impact of their institution’s  research output. Their mandate is &lt;u&gt;not&lt;/u&gt; to seek or provide alternative “business models” for journal publishing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/871398555</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/871398555</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:17:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Open Folklore</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.openfolklore.org/"&gt;Open Folklore&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The American Folklore Society (AFS) and the Indiana University  Bloomington Libraries are creating a prototype of a new scholarly  resource called Open Folklore. The vision for this open-access online  portal for folklore studies is to make a greater number and variety of  useful resources, both published and unpublished, available for the  field of folklore studies and the communities with which folklore  scholars partner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/871050068</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/871050068</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:24:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Reality Check on Open Access Monographs </title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/community/academiclibraries/853514-419/at_sparc-acrl_forum_reality_check.html.csp"&gt;Reality Check on Open Access Monographs &lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open access (OA) publishing models, pricing concerns, and the  cannibalization of print sales were the headline topics at the  SPARC-ACRL forum session on Saturday at the ALA 2010 Midwinter Meeting  in Boston, titled “The Ebook Transition: Collaboration and Innovations  Behind Open Access Monographs.” The conclusion? Open access monographs are an unprecedented boon to the  scholarly mission of dissemination, yet challenge the financial  sustainability of an academic press.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/839318896</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/839318896</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:37:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Metadata Everywhere: the Catalog is Out of the Box</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.oclc.org/nextspace/015/1.htm"&gt;Metadata Everywhere: the Catalog is Out of the Box&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="styleg"&gt;Data-about-data is now used to track materials,  assess needs, compare collections, inform research, manage workflows,  plan budgets and even make friends. Catalogers have been joined by  publishers, retail outlets, shipping companies, researchers, faculty,  Web programmers, search engine optimizers and end users in the flow of  metadata creation and modification. This puts libraries, and catalogers,  right in the middle of a revolution in how we think about representing  and describing information. And the more partners we can involve in  these processes, the more chances libraries have to add value up and  down a variety of data supply chains&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/839248352</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/839248352</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:16:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Scholarly Communication: Univ. of Toronto</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.news.utoronto.ca/forums/scholarly-communication.html"&gt;Scholarly Communication: Univ. of Toronto&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open access urges scholars to self-archive, that is, to include their  work in an online archive or repository accessible to all. Today there  are 1,764 institutional and subject archives or repositories, including U  of T’s T-Space, listed in the Registry of Open Access Repositories. The  contents are discoverable through Google and an argument for  self-archiving is that it makes your work available to the global  community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/839234750</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/839234750</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:12:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Oxford Sees Scholarly Hesitancy on Open Access</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/06/11/qt/oxford_sees_scholarly_hesitancy_on_open_access"&gt;Oxford Sees Scholarly Hesitancy on Open Access&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Academics remain reluctant to allow their journal articles to be  deposited in open-access repositories, according to the Oxford  University Press. The press announced Thursday that the percentage of  Oxford Press articles authorized for re-publication in its open-access  repository decreased overall from 6.7 to 5.9 percent between 2008 and  2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/839220372</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/839220372</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:08:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Library Consortia and Academic Libraries</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.resourceshelf.com/2010/06/10/article-consortia-and-academic-libraries/"&gt;Library Consortia and Academic Libraries&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite the emergence of open access as an alternative to the commercial publishing model, the need for libraries, consortia, and publishers to work together persists. While one can hope that new models will gain greater ascendancy, commercial publishing remains the dominant and preferred form of conveying scholarly communication among most faculty. Even with consortial collaboration, libraries have found it challenging to manage a large-scale peer-reviewed open access publishing operation, making it difficult for libraries to convince faculty that open access alternatives can replace the dedicated commercial publisher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/839205017</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/839205017</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:03:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ScholarSpace @ JCCC</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.league.org/blog/post.cfm/scholarspace-jccc"&gt;ScholarSpace @ JCCC&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The concept of  institutional repositories is frequently thought of as an exclusive implement of universities and other “Publish or Perish” four-year colleges. If this were the limit and scope  of valuable repositories, the implication would be that they are the only  entities that create scholarship worth preserving and sharing.  Fortunately, a few community colleges have stepped up to reserve space within the Web’s  global scholarly community. With the creation and maintenance of ScholarSpace @  JCCC, Johnson County  Community College (JCCC) in Overland Park, Kansas, is preserving the intellectual output of its faculty,  staff, and students.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/839181442</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/839181442</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:57:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Accessibility of Open Access Materials in Libraries</title><description>&lt;a href="http://eprints.rclis.org/18766/"&gt;The Accessibility of Open Access Materials in Libraries&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Librarians often champion open access (OA) as a sustainable alternative  to the current scholarly communications system, which is widely accepted  as being in a state of crisis. However, there has been little insight  into how far libraries are making this support tangible by providing  access to OA publications in their OPACs and other library pathways.  This study conducted a large-scale survey of US library holdings to  determine the extent that records of journals from the Directory of Open  Access Journals are held by WorldCat-affiliated Academic libraries. It  then followed up with a questionnaire inquiring into the attitudes and  practices of librarians from 100 libraries that were ranked highest out  of the total population in terms of their holdings of DOAJ journals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/819813393</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/819813393</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:55:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Research Libraries Need a Strong FCC</title><description>&lt;a href="http://policynotes.arl.org/post/819478376/research-libraries-need-a-strong-fcc"&gt;Research Libraries Need a Strong FCC&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today the Association of Research Libraries, along with the American  Library Association and EDUCAUSE, filed comments in support of the  Federal Communications Commission’s proposed “third way” forward for  broadband regulation. You can read those comments here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/819690468</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/819690468</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:13:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Using Library Experts Wisely </title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/instant_mentor/weir27"&gt;Using Library Experts Wisely &lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last spring I decided to try making a library specialist an ongoing part  the writing seminar. I got in touch with Dave MacCourt at the  University of Massachusetts library, the specialist assigned to my  department, and we met for lunch. I don’t recall Dave’s exact words when  I apologetically told him that I wanted to ditch the standard  orientation for my writing class, but they were something to the effect  that he had been waiting for years for someone to say that! We munched,  brainstormed, and hammered out a work-in-progress whose basic premise  was: do less, but do it more often until less became more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/819444304</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/819444304</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:43:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>New Issue: D-Lib Magazine</title><description>&lt;a href="http://(http//www.dlib.org/"&gt;New Issue: D-Lib Magazine&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The July/August issue of D-Lib Magazine is now available. This issue contains four articles, an opinion piece, and a conference  report. Also in this issue you can find the ‘In Brief’ column, excerpts  from recent press releases, and news of upcoming conferences and other  items of interest in ‘Clips and Pointers’.  This month, D-Lib features  The Ruth Chandler Williamson Gallery of Scripps College collection of  Japanese woodblock prints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/817054508</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/817054508</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:35:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Google and the Digital Humanities</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/07/14/google"&gt;Google and the Digital Humanities&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents of the Google Books project have argued that the effort to  scan every printed book in the world into a digital database will be a  game-changer for scholarship. Now Google is trying help digital  humanities scholars prove it. The company plans to announce today  that it is bankrolling 12 university-based research projects designed  to demonstrate the potential value to scholarship of its growing digital  vault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/810929993</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/810929993</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:59:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Intwine (beta)</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.jurn.org/intwine/index.html"&gt;Intwine (beta)&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intwine  (beta) is a supercharged “one search-box” arts &amp; humanities  search-tool, searching 100,000+ websites hand-picked by the specialists of the award-winning Intute service from 2005-2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/807495135</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/807495135</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:02:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>AcademiX 2010 Videos Now Available</title><description>&lt;a href="http://maclearning.org/article.php?article_id=47"&gt;AcademiX 2010 Videos Now Available&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Videos of AcademiX 2010 presentations are now available on the AcademiX  2010 iTunes page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://joshhonn.com/post/807479949</link><guid>http://joshhonn.com/post/807479949</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:58:17 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
